GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文六四_English英语考试网
英语
教育网
教育资讯教育政策中小学高考
学校大全
幼儿园小学初中高中高校
大学网
高校成人艺考考研就业留学大学排名
培训网
教育培训培训机构成人教育
英语网
英语学习英语单词英语语法英语口语英语听力英语阅读英语写作英语考试四六级雅思托福行业英语英语文化生活英语机构专题
国外留学
留学知识
移民
移民知识
联系我们
联系我们SITEMAP
英语英语考试

GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范文六四

2024-11-04 17:32:31 发布
26. The following appeared in a memorandum1 from a member of a financial management
and consulting firm.
       "We have learned from an employee of Windfall, Ltd., that its accounting2
department, by checking about ten percent of the last month s purchasing invoices4 for
errors and inconsistencies, saved the company some $10,000 in overpayments. In order
to help our clients increase their net gains, we should advice each of them to institute a
policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Such a recommendation could
also help us get the Windfall account by demonstrating to Windfall the rigorousness of
our methods."
 
Sample Essay 1:
       The argument that checking all purchasing invoices for errors will not only
increase the net gains of the clients but also help the firm get the Windfall account is not
entirely5 logically convincing, since it ignores certain crucial assumptions.
       First, the argument assumes that instituting a policy of checking all purchasing
invoices can help find out the errors and inconsistencies. There are a number of reasons
why this might not be true. For example, the people who check the accounts will
probably make mistakes as anyone else, intentionally6 or unconsciously. If they do,
checking purchasing invoices will not help avoid errors and inconsistencies.
       Second, even if the checking can help avoid errors and inconsistencies, it will not
necessarily save money for the company, for it is also likely that the accounting
department makes no mistakes. If they have no errors, how can the checking save
money for the company.
       Finally, even supposing the checking does save money for the company, the
argument ignores the fact that the checking itself costs the company money. If the cost
is more than the gains from the errors, the company will lose money.
       Thus, the argument is not completely sound. The evidence in support of the
conclusion that the checking of last month s invoices has saved the company $10,000
does little prove the conclusion-that checking all purchasing invoices for errors will
increase the net gains of the clients but also help the firm get the Windfall account-since
it does not address the assumptions I have already raised. Ultimately, the argument
might have been strengthened by making it plain that checking all invoices will surely
help find out errors, that all the invoices are bound to contain errors, and that the
checking itself will not cost much.
 
Sample Essay 2:
      In this argument a member of a financial management and consulting firm reasons
that since Windfall Ltd. increased its net gains by checking 10 percent of its purchasing
invoices for errors, it would be a good idea to advise the firm s clients to institute a 
policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Two potential benefits are
foreseen from this recommendation: it could help the firm s clients increase their net
gains, and it could help the firm land the Windfall account. The member s argument is
unconvincing for a couple of reasons.
      The main problem with the argument is that the conclusion is based upon
insufficient7 evidence. The fact that some of Windfall s purchasing invoices contained
errors might simply be attributable to the sloppy8 accounting practices of Windfall s
suppliers. Thus, rather than indicating a general problem, the invoice3 errors might
simply be indicative of a problem that is specific to Windfall Ltd. In other words, the
evidence drawn9 from Windfall s experience is insufficient to support the conclusion that
all purchasing invoices are subject to similar errors.
      Secondly10, the evidence offered in the argument suggests only that companies
purchasing from the same suppliers that Windfall purchases from are likely to
experience similar problems. If the firm s clients do not purchase from Windfall s
suppliers, checking for errors might turn out to be a monumental waste of time.
      In conclusion, the author s argument fails to provide good grounds for instituting
the policy of routinely checking purchasing invoices for errors. To strengthen the
conclusion the author would have to provide evidence that this is a widespread problem.
Specifically, what is required are additional instances of purchasing invoices containing
errors that are drawn from various companies

TAG:英语 | 英语考试
文章链接:https://english.9educ.com/enks/185565.html
提示:当前页面信息来源自互联网,仅做为信息参考,并不提供商业服务,也不提供下载与分享,本站也不为此信息做任何负责,内容或者图片如有侵权请及时联系本站,我们将在第一时间做出修改或者删除
旅游
2010年考研英语复习需要注意四大问题
以下4个问题是每年考研过程中都经常出现或同学们经常问到的几个问题, 我们今天具体谈一下,希望给这
2008下半年PETS考试报名时间已确定
2008年下半年PETS考试的报名时间已确定,报名时间为2008年6月10日至18日,考试时间为
GRE出国考试阅读理解辅导:GRE难句解
59.While the new doctrine1 seems almost certainl
全国公共英语二级考试模拟试题六(含答案分
第三部分:阅读理解 What are some of the steps a person c
GMAT考试写作指导:Argument范
26. The following appeared in a memorandum1 from
教育本站内容和图片均来自互联网,仅供读者参考,请勿转载与分享,如有内容和图片有误或者涉及侵权请及时联系本站处理。
酒店景点景区旅游整形美容品牌养生健康移民留学英语大学学校教育法律服装电商母婴美食植物宠物生活百科健身数码化妆体育游戏时尚娱乐潮流网红